Jump to content

Learning photography


Droozy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Got digital SLR models to recommend??

 

i myself own a 2nd hand 20D which i got for $800..and recently, just spent another $850 on an L lens..

 

i would recommend the mid range DSLR for you..and just get 1 good lens which you use the most can liao..

Thanks for the advice.

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

oh mm... lumix Fz 18 not gd in night pics ? thanks bro [;)] I like wide angle and big zoom ..

 

seriously i'm not a reviewer or anything near that.. so i can't answer those lumix stuff questions... its best u go down to the store and try for yourself... u know your own needs and demands... forget about buying in those IT shows... all cut carrot head one... free lots of rubbish stuff u might not even need/know...

Link to post
Share on other sites

How can FX 10 unable to take nice night photography ?

 

Did you use timer mode ?

 

nice night shots got nothing to do with timer mode... its a balance combination of higher iso, lower shutter and bigger aperture...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

I did use timer and tripod .. some pics turn out gd some not really... FX 18 gd ? I like the big zoom :)

 

How can FX 10 unable to take nice night photography ?

 

Did you use timer mode ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie
Cool. Will check those models out during the IT show then. What's the indicative prices for these two models?

 

think the D300 body alone is abt 2-3k

 

D3 think is >$5k

 

or go ebay buy 2nd hand D100, D200 or D80.

 

and get a good good lens (those constant F2.8 ones).

 

 

why F2.8? can share ahare? [:)]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Aperture controls the amount of light entering the camera. The aperture no. is usually only represented by the denominator (it's actually a fraction). So the smaller the aperture no., the bigger the physical aperture is and the more light can enter the camera, e.g. an aperture of F2.8 is twice as big as F5.6.

 

Why do you want to be able to allow more light to enter the camera? For this, you need to know how the 'trinity' in the camera interplay with one another - aperture size, shutter speed and ISO rating. You can read up more by doing a simple internet search. Some of them draw relevance of this 3 parameters to water running from a tap and a pail collecting the water underneath. [:)]

 

Happy learning!

Link to post
Share on other sites

High ISO ? you sure ?

 

TS is refering to still life night photography and not human photography in low lighting. Why need to use large aperture ? [dizzy]

 

depends on case by case la... large aperture can reduce noise might appear in high iso...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

F2.8 so that more light can enter, which means you would be able to use a faster shutter speed, which means there would be less chances of your photos coming out blur/unsharp due to handshake.

 

it is generally more expensive to manufacture lenses with max apertures of F2.8 as the optics (glass) would have to be bigger and of higher quality (in order to reduce distortions at the edges)

 

Also, with a bigger aperture, your viewfinder would also be brighter. Your camera would also be able to focus better and faster in low lighting conditions.

 

of course, since the optics are bigger, the lens is also generally heavier.

 

if you're really passionate about photography, you might want to consider getting one although the price would be much steeper.

 

the nikon 17-55mm f2.8 costs about 2k +/- brand new.

 

I got mine 2nd hand from ebay, think for about 1.4k 1.5k (incld shipping). Have not regretted since.

 

of course, the zoom range is a little short. so it depends on what you're taking mostly.

 

my previous lens was the 24-85mm f3.5/4.5. lens was able to go really close to subject (as in macro) but the wide angle wasn't wide enough for me. so I lost out on the 55-85mm range.

 

so far, there's no 1 lens that can give you quality and convenience. you'd have to decide.

Link to post
Share on other sites

let's see..

 

a canon 1Dmk3(highest of the hig end) cost 12k..

 

and a 1200mm L lens cost USD80k..can prob buy you a CTR liao.. [laugh]

 

but a mid range one prob cost less than 2k..

 

i reco you get the 400D or the 40D..both are decent cams..

Link to post
Share on other sites

But it's worthwhile. I feel taking a photo is like taking a snapshot of that moment in time. When you look back at the photos years later, it brings back lots of memories, some sweet, same sad...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...