Sabian Turbocharged January 24, 2008 Share January 24, 2008 BT-24 Jan 2008 Under Computer Misuse Act, they could face up to 20 years in jail, fine up to $125,000 By CONRAD RAJ (SINGAPORE) In an unprecedented action, seven former Citibankers were hauled into court yesterday to face a combined total of 1,223 charges, largely for stealing clients' information before joining rival banks and thereby allegedly violating sections of the Computer Misuse Act. The charges are said to have arisen from a complaint filed by Citibank with the police and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) after six of the seven defected from the bank in mid-2006 to join rival banks, including Switzerland's UBS Bank. All seven had been servicing high net worth clients with Citibank, with investments ranging from a few hundred thousand dollars to over $10 million. Citibank had earlier taken out civil proceedings against several of the seven charged, for having sent or taken confidential information via their computers. The US bank had in its suits alleged that some of the bankers had urged their rich clients to jump ship, taking about S$50 million of business to UBS. Those now charged in court include former Citibank branch manager Jonathan Seah, 44, and six others. They are former relationship managers Carel Low Siok Liang, 33; Wendy Quek Lien Lien, 30; Jelene Lee Kit Peng, 34; Esther Lim Siew May, 31; and Lydia Koh Meng Yang, 28. Each of them faces between three and 264 charges. Also charged was Low's assistant, service relationship manager Valarie Lim Ming Huey. They are alleged to have either accessed Citibank's computers without authorisation to get information or sent files containing customer information to email addresses outside the company. As some of the charges are under the enhanced provisions of the Computer Misuse Act, those so charged could face up to 20 years in prison and/or a fine of up to $125,000. Several of the charges were under the Banking Act, while one of the accused was charged with destroying evidence. They are said to have acted in three separate groups independently of each other. While the names of some of Citibank's clients were said to have appeared on the charge sheets, the court ordered that they not be made public. Seah, who was one of those who joined UBS in 2006, is said to have left the Swiss bank the same year for undisclosed reasons. He had been accused by Citibank of having sent confidential information, including details of customers and their investments, an organisational chart of the bank and personal appraisals of at least seven staff, to his personal email address. The bank had said that Seah had breached his contract and pointed out that the majority of the emails were sent a day before his resignation, the day itself and the day after. Esther Lim was accused by Citibank of forwarding confidential customer information to Seah including names, addresses, contact numbers, the value of assets and breakdown of investments before she left the bank. According to a Citibank spokesman, all the civil suits were 'favourably' settled during the course of last year. The accused were said to have compensated the bank. When it filed the civil suits, Citibank had said: 'The privacy of customer, proprietary or confidential information is one of our highest priorities. We will always act to protect the privacy of such information.' UBS, three of whose employees (Wendy Quek, Jelene Lee and Lydia Koh) were among the seven charged yesterday, is said to have placed the three under suspension pending the outcome of the case. A spokeswoman said: 'It is not appropriate for us to comment on this as it is a personal matter between the individuals and the authorities.' The unprecedented action by the authorities may put a curb on poaching of private bankers and others, especially professionals like lawyers, observers said. ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoonz 4th Gear January 25, 2008 Share January 25, 2008 Citibank tu lan that they lost customers to rival banks ah? I'm sure they also have used information from other banks mah... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ronnchee Clutched January 25, 2008 Share January 25, 2008 They can ask for injunction from court, to restrick UBS from solicit their clients, can they ?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoonz 4th Gear January 25, 2008 Share January 25, 2008 Tedious process... But seems like Citibank might be doing it after they bring the ex citibankers to court first... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wanderer Clutched January 25, 2008 Share January 25, 2008 Hmmm......... 1 guy and six females... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toyo 1st Gear January 25, 2008 Share January 25, 2008 tat's the end of their banking career many of them are still young Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabian Turbocharged January 25, 2008 Author Share January 25, 2008 this is not new in the industry but usually customers stick with the bank not the RM. i think they really stepped on the wrong toes or pissed someone off big time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoonz 4th Gear January 25, 2008 Share January 25, 2008 Or UBS might have paid them big time for the info? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabian Turbocharged January 25, 2008 Author Share January 25, 2008 Not really end of banking career. If ur sales figures is good, some bank will take you in. or else change industry lor, salesmanship is transferable across industry. one of them already moved into real estate when the case was blown up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabian Turbocharged January 25, 2008 Author Share January 25, 2008 ok lah... nothing between them. just sway to be made example of. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabian Turbocharged January 25, 2008 Author Share January 25, 2008 when banks hire, they expect u to have a decent pot of customers who are willing to stick with you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoonz 4th Gear January 25, 2008 Share January 25, 2008 Then how is citibank going to charge these 7 fellas? If the customers choose to follow the person rather than the bank, citibank still have a case? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kb27 Supersonic January 25, 2008 Share January 25, 2008 These are the people who drive big luxurious cars. I wonder if they will be selling them soon? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheerios Neutral Newbie January 25, 2008 Share January 25, 2008 BT-24 Jan 2008 Under Computer Misuse Act, they could face up to 20 years in jail, fine up to $125,000 By CONRAD RAJ (SINGAPORE) In an unprecedented action, seven former Citibankers were hauled into court yesterday to face a combined total of 1,223 charges, largely for stealing clients' information before joining rival banks and thereby allegedly violating sections of the Computer Misuse Act. The charges are said to have arisen from a complaint filed by Citibank with the police and the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) after six of the seven defected from the bank in mid-2006 to join rival banks, including Switzerland's UBS Bank. All seven had been servicing high net worth clients with Citibank, with investments ranging from a few hundred thousand dollars to over $10 million. Citibank had earlier taken out civil proceedings against several of the seven charged, for having sent or taken confidential information via their computers. The US bank had in its suits alleged that some of the bankers had urged their rich clients to jump ship, taking about S$50 million of business to UBS. Those now charged in court include former Citibank branch manager Jonathan Seah, 44, and six others. They are former relationship managers Carel Low Siok Liang, 33; Wendy Quek Lien Lien, 30; Jelene Lee Kit Peng, 34; Esther Lim Siew May, 31; and Lydia Koh Meng Yang, 28. Each of them faces between three and 264 charges. Also charged was Low's assistant, service relationship manager Valarie Lim Ming Huey. They are alleged to have either accessed Citibank's computers without authorisation to get information or sent files containing customer information to email addresses outside the company. As some of the charges are under the enhanced provisions of the Computer Misuse Act, those so charged could face up to 20 years in prison and/or a fine of up to $125,000. Several of the charges were under the Banking Act, while one of the accused was charged with destroying evidence. They are said to have acted in three separate groups independently of each other. While the names of some of Citibank's clients were said to have appeared on the charge sheets, the court ordered that they not be made public. Seah, who was one of those who joined UBS in 2006, is said to have left the Swiss bank the same year for undisclosed reasons. He had been accused by Citibank of having sent confidential information, including details of customers and their investments, an organisational chart of the bank and personal appraisals of at least seven staff, to his personal email address. The bank had said that Seah had breached his contract and pointed out that the majority of the emails were sent a day before his resignation, the day itself and the day after. Esther Lim was accused by Citibank of forwarding confidential customer information to Seah including names, addresses, contact numbers, the value of assets and breakdown of investments before she left the bank. According to a Citibank spokesman, all the civil suits were 'favourably' settled during the course of last year. The accused were said to have compensated the bank. When it filed the civil suits, Citibank had said: 'The privacy of customer, proprietary or confidential information is one of our highest priorities. We will always act to protect the privacy of such information.' UBS, three of whose employees (Wendy Quek, Jelene Lee and Lydia Koh) were among the seven charged yesterday, is said to have placed the three under suspension pending the outcome of the case. A spokeswoman said: 'It is not appropriate for us to comment on this as it is a personal matter between the individuals and the authorities.' The unprecedented action by the authorities may put a curb on poaching of private bankers and others, especially professionals like lawyers, observers said. will they go to jail for that? i hope they do.. kns! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cheerios Neutral Newbie January 25, 2008 Share January 25, 2008 jail them!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sabian Turbocharged January 25, 2008 Author Share January 25, 2008 the official reason is they flouted the Computer Misuse Act.... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wham Neutral Newbie January 25, 2008 Share January 25, 2008 (edited) Hmmm......... 1 guy and six females are guilty which fall under one of the seven deadly sins - Greed!!! Edited January 25, 2008 by Wham Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Typhoonz 4th Gear January 25, 2008 Share January 25, 2008 Huh? How have they misued the computer? Or don't have any other acts to sue them for then just tambah... ↡ Advertisement Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In NowRelated Discussions
Related Discussions
How to People Managed to Drive With Bald Tyres?
How to People Managed to Drive With Bald Tyres?
Encounters with tyre shop
Encounters with tyre shop
Ho Hup Seng......Some good info for our Brudders
Ho Hup Seng......Some good info for our Brudders
Share your painful experience with your financial investment
Share your painful experience with your financial investment
Forklift operators in Spore charged for bribery!
Forklift operators in Spore charged for bribery!
I am diagnose with another incurable illness
I am diagnose with another incurable illness
Suu Kyi detained
Suu Kyi detained
Driver of Maserati found guilty of causing grievous hurt to policeman, faces 59 other charges
Driver of Maserati found guilty of causing grievous hurt to policeman, faces 59 other charges