Jump to content

Nuclear Power


Supercharged
 Share

Recommended Posts

Ya, agree nuclear fusion is less dangerous and produces more power. But presently, nobody have found a cheap and efficient way to produce nuclear fusion (presently, nuclear fusion needs nuclear fission).

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Chernobly happen because of unsafe practices. On the contrary, 3-mile island wasn't even a disaster. All e safety features wrked, and nobody died.

 

3-mile island was spiced up to make the newspapers selltongue.gif

Link to post
Share on other sites

Boy Boy, we cannot even improve Safety at our construction site, shipyard and other industry, what make u think Safety wont be compromise in a nuclear plant

Link to post
Share on other sites

There is a study before. think if they built a small one at one of the offshore island. it is enough to power up the whole of SG and safe from any fall out.

 

Agreed. There is already a prototype of a mini floating nuclear power plant. The Russians already have that technology.

 

Check out this link.

 

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Floating_nuclear_power_plant

Link to post
Share on other sites

Supercharged

actually there are about 400 over nuclear plants in the world, how often do you hear them having leak or something? Furthermore most of these nuclear plants are in countries which are even more un-regulated than Spore.

 

uranium prices had went up 7 folds in 2 years...those who have invested in it would have been laughing all the way to the bank. With $100 oil price coming up and global warming issues, it will be a matter of time when a nuclear plant is absolutely neccessary.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If a sub can be nuclear powered and the crew can operated and sleepalongside it. I believe with proper measure. SG can also build and maintance a nuclear power plant.

 

 

So....... just buy the sub from US and parked it at our Changi Naval Base (24hrs guards). Connect a cable to it and [idea][idea] ta....ta..... cheap power supply. [laugh][laugh][laugh]

 

 

Ahhhhh........ better still, buy a nuclear Aircraft Carrier, double function as power supply and airbase on land scarce Singapore. [sly][sly][sly]

Link to post
Share on other sites

"You haven't thought about the repercussions of having nuclear power??

 

1) Accident = Singapore population is wiped out in event of explosion. Radioactive discharge means cancer/radiation sickness for everyone"

 

 

 

No..no..no.. not wiped out but 4 million Hulks after the radiation. [sly][sly]

 

Then we can control the world and make the whole world into :- One People, One Nation, One Singapore. [smash][smash][smash]

 

 

[laugh][laugh][laugh][laugh][laugh]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie
Ya, agree nuclear fusion is less dangerous and produces more power. But presently, nobody have found a cheap and efficient way to produce nuclear fusion (presently, nuclear fusion needs nuclear fission).

 

Currently scientist have managed to create a nuclear fusion reaction. This was not acheive via nuclear fission. You are confused with how hydrogen bombs work. However the amount of energy required is much more than the amount created.

 

Secondly, the reaction is not sustainable because there is no materials currently available that can withstand the pressure and temperature involved. In the experiments, a plasma containment barrier was used. But in order to generate this barrier again requires much more energy than created as well.

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...