Jump to content

World of Wheels Salesman Jimmy Ang in Dishonest Trade

Gfoo

By Gfoo,
in Complaints

 Share

Recommended Posts

Gfoo

Gfoo

Neutral Newbie
(edited)

From Sviper - previously posted on RX8Club:

 

About time i came out and let the whole world know about this. I just recieved my Rx8 last month after a heart wrecking 3 month wait for it. Trust me when i say heart wrecking. For that 3 months i was constantly being tossed from left to right by the PI and the salesman who handled my sales. By not disclosing the names of the PI and salesman, i wish not to further bring up past disputes or quarrels against other PIs and salesman.

 

Soon after i made my downpayments and cash for accessories like any ordinary person would. I realised that i was actually issuing cheques to the saleman under his name. First initial

Edited by Gadgeter
↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites
Freakman

Freakman

Neutral Newbie

report police, get the bank to certified the person who cash out your chq, then get lawyer to proceed with the rest paper work...

 

but still you are too foolish to issue the chq in the 1st place..

Link to post
Share on other sites
Silver_z

Silver_z

1st Gear

Want to share info..... Post it. Dun link when people need a USERID to read.

 

Extract from the http://www.civicfd-sg.com/

 

"World of Wheels (S) Pte Ltd hereby give notice to all persons who have posted defamatory remarks against World of Wheels (S) Pte Ltd on this website and/or any other website that unless all such postings are removed within the next 24 hours, World of Wheels (S) Pte Ltd will construe their continued posting of the said defamatory remarks and their refusal to remove the same as an act of aggravated dafamation that warrants aggravated damages.

 

Take note that World of Wheels (S) Pte Ltd reserves their rights to take action with regards any defamatory statements made at any time on this website and/or any other website"

Link to post
Share on other sites
Silver_z

Silver_z

1st Gear
(edited)

The company employ the salesperson, and the company entrusted the power to the salesperson to act on behalf of the company. Customer should go after the company. Company go after their own employees. If company dun have to be responsible for the acts of their employees, then why the fark they care about their background and credibility?

Edited by Silver_z
Link to post
Share on other sites
Galantspeedz

Galantspeedz

Turbocharged

but what happen now is the chq was issued to the salesman in the salesman name.

 

sad to say, i will have to agree that the TS can't go after the company as car was delivered as promised.

 

but on the other, the TS did not say much about the company.

 

2 ways to look at it i guess.

 

Previous when i got a subaru, the MI saleslady asked me issue to her name too. i told her fly kite, and becuz of that request, i made here write the time and date she took my IC and when she will return it to me...

Link to post
Share on other sites
Ghostrider

Ghostrider

3rd Gear

He can actually get the money back from the company...

 

The salesman was acting as a servant to the company and not in his individual capacity. As long as his monies was paid to the servant and not in the sales personal capacity...the the money is deem to been made to the company as the sales was respresting the company at the time of transaction.

 

The sticky issue here is...

 

He issued part of the payment to the salesman man....the face saving grace is that he has the agreement written in black and white...so he can argue that he tot it was their company policy.

 

The crime here is....company broke the agreement (if they hold the car without delivery due to the shortfall). As the owner is concern...money paid to company and he has black and white to proof it.

 

Salesman commited breach of trust. So if the company wants to sue him or not its their pasah...

 

If I am the owner...I will ask the boss if he wishes to proceed with the sales and deliver the car. If he dun wan...then I will send him a lawyer letter. Period...why argue.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Scoots

Scoots

3rd Gear

Sad case of carelessness. These are my thoughts:

 

1.Yeah, it was really a bad oversight in issueing the cheque in the salesman's name. However, once that was discovered, you could have tried to called up the bank to cancel those cheques (assuming still possible)

 

2.If not, seperate the sale and the allegered 'personal loan'. Have the salesman commit in writing that he had taken a loan of $8K from you immediately. That way, HE cannot run away.

 

3.Carry on with the sales of your car at the slowest pace possible, while chasing the salesman as fast as possible.

 

Not sure if that's the best course of action, but it's what I may very well have gone with.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Scoots

Scoots

3rd Gear
Want to share info..... Post it. Dun link when people need a USERID to read.

 

Extract from the http://www.civicfd-sg.com/

 

"World of Wheels (S) Pte Ltd hereby give notice to all persons who have posted defamatory remarks against World of Wheels (S) Pte Ltd on this website and/or any other website that unless all such postings are removed within the next 24 hours, World of Wheels (S) Pte Ltd will construe their continued posting of the said defamatory remarks and their refusal to remove the same as an act of aggravated dafamation that warrants aggravated damages.

 

Take note that World of Wheels (S) Pte Ltd reserves their rights to take action with regards any defamatory statements made at any time on this website and/or any other website"

 

Guess it's their burden to prove that the remarks are 'defamatory'. If not, this could end up being a re-enactment of the golden tap saga .... [sly]

Link to post
Share on other sites
Gfoo

Gfoo

Neutral Newbie
  • Author
(edited)

Extract from the http://www.civicfd-sg.com/

 

"World of Wheels (S) Pte Ltd hereby give notice to all persons who have posted defamatory remarks against World of Wheels (S) Pte Ltd on this website and/or any other website that unless all such postings are removed within the next 24 hours, World of Wheels (S) Pte Ltd will construe their continued posting of the said defamatory remarks and their refusal to remove the same as an act of aggravated dafamation that warrants aggravated damages.

 

Take note that World of Wheels (S) Pte Ltd reserves their rights to take action with regards any defamatory statements made at any time on this website and/or any other website"

 

 

In Response

 

This is in response to your alleged notice. In reference to the abovementioned replication of an original post dated 6 June 2007 on RX8Club.com by Sviper, it is put to you that the contents of that post is deemed true and valid as an opinion by the aforesaid author. Additionally, and not withstanding, such an opinion is, and can be, backed by both documentary and third party evidence with regards to any or all proceedings detailed in the content of that post.

 

You will also note that the aforesaid post makes reference to the actions of a Mr Jimmy Ang who at the point of transaction, was an employee and representative of World of Wheels, and where such an opinion is, and can be, backed by both documentary and third party evidence with regards to any or all proceedings detailed in the content of that post.

 

While your request for removal is noted, it cannot be recognized till true and valid justification can be provided in support of the removal of the above post.

 

All rights are retained

Edited by Gfoo
Link to post
Share on other sites
Galantspeedz

Galantspeedz

Turbocharged

Truth from? the TS, the company WOW or you?

 

pls rem, we have now listen to only 1 side of the story.

 

I dun doubt the TS but what facts are u toking about when it comes from 1 person.

 

And if this become legal, let the judge make the judgement, NOT YOU!!

Link to post
Share on other sites
Gfoo

Gfoo

Neutral Newbie
  • Author

Agree with you, let the judge make the judgement - and let's make this even bigger by getting CPIB to audit their books to see if everything is kosher. This event is backed by signed documents by the salesperson, and multiple, unrelated 3rd parties.

 

The post by sviper which is replicated stated a true situation by the salesman, which unfortunately for WoW, represented them at the time of the sale. How this affects WoW's reputation is up to public interpretation.

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share
Go to topic listing
×
×
  • Create New...