Van driver forgets hand-brake; crashes into car

[Nutty]

 

The victim really suay.

Edited November 21, 2006 by Nutty

[Terenc3]

Wah.. It just rolled all the way front ar? Toyota IST right? Sway sia.. Haiyo..

[Nutty]

Wonder if the Toyota IST can make a 100% claim from the Van.

[Tony76]

Looks like just a bump.:)

[Ccssgm]

In the Car Park.........Like Insurance Company Dun Cover........

[Ldawn88]

wah, the red car next to the ist is heng.

[Unltd]

Can claim meh? Who is the driver (no driver)!

 

Cut whose NCD?

[Spec]

as usual onlookers start to gather.......

[Nutty]

That's why I'm curious whether can claim bo.

 

Maybe Mr Guyver can tell us.

[Unltd]

Can!! Claim against the van, ghost driver!! NCD protected....

[Zirco]

In the Car Park.........Like Insurance Company Dun Cover........

Got cover lar. I did a claim before

[Ccssgm]

[Passion]

Dont you guys think a bit wasted?Crash into the Ist.If crash into the red car,better,he claim the money and then scrapped the car liao.Seems like so old.

[Zirco]

My car was parked and a guy reversed into me lor. wah piang! The best thing is i was walking to the car and i saw it.

[Nutty]

So you are lucky to witness the incident. It could have easily been a hit-n-run.

[Zirco]

Yeah lor. If not i need to spend $$$ liao.

[Gioz74]

why not?

the van owner just have to name the driver at the point of time.

if no driver cannot claim then wat about those who lost their car in malaysia?

they also park and go shopping and eating and come back car gone!

 

the van driver is responsible for not pulling handbrake.

 

but from the pic it shows more like a kiss onli.

[Ccssgm]

Luckly other party never call u to go to his workshop.........Claim is

 

better than going to his workshop.........