Jump to content

Tough enough


Turbobrick
 Share

Recommended Posts

Conti owners, what do you think of the overall "toughness" of your car bodywork?

 

I find the new Volvos not as rigid as the older models probably due to improvements in impact beams and crumple zones. Thus defeating the need for a though outer body shell. [:|]

↡ Advertisement
Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

We used to think that the more rigid the body is, the 'safer' the car is. Which is not true, of course. In a collision, the energy transfer in a rigid car can injure it's passengers seriously. The engineers are aware of this, so we have crumple zones which are designed to collapse/crumple and absorb most of the impact, thereby keeping the passengers safe. The car can appear to be badly damaged but the cabin has to maintain it's shape to protect the passengers.

 

The parts that's continued to be strenghtened are the chassis, the passenger cabin frame plus the addition of side impact beams.

 

Door panels offer little protection to side impact. To be effective, the thickness have to be increased. A metal sheet thick enough to resist some degree of side impact will be very heavy and impractical. Hence the side impact beam/s. With the beams, the passengers will be better protected. It also enables the door panel to be thinner, thus saving weight.

 

Just my $0.02.

 

Cheers!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Correct Mike! Much like Forumla 1 cars, the outer shell is not the key protection but the monokote (donno spelling) internal shell. The crumple zone, collaspsable steering, impact beams are all part of the modern car's endless strive to better protecting the users.

 

Well at least car thrash can claim insurance, your life is invaluable!

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

Having crumple zones on a vehicle ensures the passengers won't get the brunt of the impact.

 

But doesn't that effectively make the car a 1 accident product ? After 1 front impact crash, declare total loss, buy new car ?

 

Maybe we are living in the disposable car era compared to the old Beetles, Mercs, Beemers and Minis.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OT here, the circumstances of senna's death suggest it would still be fatal even with today's F1 safety. what i understand was when he crashed, a tyre flew and banged his head, or something like a suspension component pierced his helmet. whatever it is, it wasn't the impact of the crash...a pity really, else we wouldn't have seen a 5 time WDC

Link to post
Share on other sites

most conti cars start with the structural integrity to protect passengers & driver.....then the panels added like roof, mud-guards, bonnet, boot, doors, etc are then added. These formed the crumple zones. [:p]

Edited by Normal_aspirated
Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

FI car design is about light weight and high speed. Safety is important but they can't have all those safety features without adding more weight to the cars.

Link to post
Share on other sites

OT here, the circumstances of senna's death suggest it would still be fatal even with today's F1 safety. what i understand was when he crashed, a tyre flew and banged his head..

 

Which is why, after his accident the FIA made it mandatory for the wheels to be attached by tethers to the body, so it doesn't fly off in such a manner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie
OT here, the circumstances of senna's death suggest it would still be fatal even with today's F1 safety. what i understand was when he crashed, a tyre flew and banged his head, or something like a suspension component pierced his helmet. whatever it is, it wasn't the impact of the crash...a pity really, else we wouldn't have seen a 5 time WDC

 

it was a sad day for some of us .. [smallcry]

 

but the lessons are not forgotten and i believe that a car should in the first place protect its occupants irregardless of scenario.. [angel]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Conti owners, what do you think of the overall "toughness" of your car bodywork?

 

I find the new Volvos not as rigid as the older models probably due to improvements in impact beams and crumple zones. Thus defeating the need for a though outer body shell. [:|]

 

Tough? There are about 10 ten-cent coin sizes dings all around my car. People open door = dented panel. Until I can't be bothered anymore.

 

Sian...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie
Korean metals the worst .....just brush your ass across the door and it will dent

 

You meant "Japanese" metal? Toyotas and Hondas are the worst offenders in that regard.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Neutral Newbie

used to be that my dudes always joked about how easy you can make a dent on jap/korean rides.. [:p]

 

once they start owning some , they arn't joking much now.. [:|]

 

but all cars can have dents no matter what .. [flowerface]

 

just have to get some good people to fix them up .. $$ per dent... [sweatdrop]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

×
×
  • Create New...